Anne Rice's Interview With The Vampire
Throughout the many media that I've seen
that have handled vampires as a subject matter, vampires have almost always
been described as a creature, even though they're mostly described to have
rooted from humans. Therefore, vampire seems like an afterlife of humans.
Mostly associated with cold body temperature and immortality, to me vampires
are like a beautiful version of a 'walking dead'.
From Anne Rice's novel Interview with the Vampire, the protagonist of the book itself is
vampire Louis, which I believe allows the readers to experience themselves the
somewhat surreal view of the world and experience of the vampire. Just like
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, the narrative structure of the book is unique in
the way that the book itself is not directly telling the story, but instead it
is the protagonist who is telling the actual story while participating in an interview
with a boy.
Nowadays, modern literature and film
productions that illustrate vampires mostly depict the actual everyday life of
a vampire, trying to build out the difference between the creatures and humans in
an accurate way. I feel that this is why vampires mostly feel like a ‘different
being’, because the contrast is so clear. Interview
with the Vampire also illustrates Louis as having lost his ‘human like
emotions and feelings’ after becoming a vampire, including the ‘blood thirst
desire’ that is common in vampire literature.
However, Anne Rice doesn’t jump into Louis’
life as a vampire, but focuses more on how he has ended up in that shape.
Especially between the contrast that is shown between Louis and Lestat, Louis
is comparably more human-like, and his terror of turning into a vampire is much
more obvious as well. While other literature such as Twilight pushes the part
of ‘humans turning into vampires’ towards more of a minor element, Interview with the Vampire starts off
the story with Louis’ tale of what it was like to change into an entirely
different being.
It was interesting how Anne Rice was still
able to push the human-parts of Louis while her descriptions and choice of
simile made him look almost as a ‘nonliving’ being. Just as I said about
vampires felt like a beautiful version of a walking dead, vocabularies that I
found were associated towards vampires in the first impression of Louis were “bleached,
skull, and statue”. It all feels very artificial and does pushes vampires away
from the well-known descriptions we are most familiar towards.
However, there
is a mixture of Louis’ experience of horror that really pulls us back from the
sense of difference. Even though Louis quotes that as Lestat said his feeling
of terror wasn’t real, it is the process of his realization that really stands
out. Louis went through this moment of enlightenment because he had to lose
what he had, which is his ‘human emotions’. The loss really emphasizes that
there is a piece of human nature within vampires, which is why this novel
contrasts from all the well-known vampires spread throughout modern media.
Comments
Post a Comment